Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 28, 2014; 20(36): 13052-13059
Published online Sep 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i36.13052
Published online Sep 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i36.13052
Table 2 Treatment of anal intraepithelial neoplasia
Therapy | Pro | Con | Ref. |
Watchful waiting | Avoids the morbidity of other therapies | Missed opportunity to potentially cure patient | [7] |
Low risk of interval development of carcinoma (for low-grade) | Need for close surveillance and reliable patient | ||
Topical imiquimod | Response rate of 48%-86% | Burning, irritation, variable patient compliance | [14-16] |
Recurrence or new lesions in untreated areas | |||
Topical 5-florouracil | High response rate, up to 90% | High recurrence rate, up to 50% | [17,18] |
Wide local excision | Recurrence rates as low as 13% reported | Significant morbidity of anal stenosis, wound healing and incontinence | [19-21] |
Targeted therapy with HRA | Evidence to prevent progression to anal cancer | High rate of persistent or recurrent disease in HIV positive patients | [22-24] |
Avoid anal stenosis and incontinence |
- Citation: Osborne MC, Maykel J, Johnson EK, Steele SR. Anal squamous cell carcinoma: An evolution in disease and management. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(36): 13052-13059
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i36/13052.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i36.13052