Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 21, 2014; 20(35): 12637-12648
Published online Sep 21, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i35.12637
Published online Sep 21, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i35.12637
Study | Compound | Species | Sex | Sample size1 | Dosage (mg/kg) | Route | Test | Test day | Effects2 |
Bostanoğlu et al[12] | Iloprost | Rat | Male | 40 | 0.002 | IP | BPR | 3/7 | ↑82/NS |
Galanopoulos et al[13] | Iloprost | Rat | Male | 40 | 0.002 | IP | BPR | 4/8 | ↑56/NS |
Vasiliadis et al[14] | Iloprost | Rat | Male | 20 | 0.002 | IP | BPR | 5/8 | ↑78/NS |
Kiyama et al[15] | Tacrolimus | Rat | Male | 42 | 0.01/0.1/1.0 | SC | BPR | 4 | ↑23/↑33/↑27 |
Raptis et al[16] | Tacrolimus | Rat | Male | 40 | 0.1 | SC | BPR | 4/8 | ↑60/↑43 |
Schäffer et al[17] | Tacrolimus | Rat | Male | 24 | 2.0 | SC | BPR | 5 | NS |
- Citation: Øines MN, Krarup PM, Jorgensen LN, Ågren MS. Pharmacological interventions for improved colonic anastomotic healing: A meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(35): 12637-12648
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i35/12637.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i35.12637