Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 14, 2014; 20(34): 12322-12329
Published online Sep 14, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i34.12322
Table 1 Characteristics of the included articles n (%)
Ref.YearCountrySettingNumber of patientsNSAID dose and durationPEP in NSAID groupPEP in placebo group
Murray et al[18]2003ScotlandSingle center220Suppository, 100 mg after ERCP7 (6.4)17 (15.5)
Cheon et al[17]2007United StatesSingle center207Oral, 50 mg before and after ERCP17 (16.2)17 (16.7)
Sotoudehmanesh et al[9]2007IranSingle center480Suppository, 100 mg before ERCP7 (2.8)15 (6.1)
Montaño Loza et al[19]2007MexicoSingle center150Suppository, 100 mg before ERCP4 (5.3)-
Khoshbaten et al[16]2008IranSingle center100Suppository, 100 mg after ERCP2 (4.0)13 (26.0)
Senol et al[15]2009TurkeySingle center80Infusion, 75 mg after ERCP3 (7.5)7 (17.5)
Elmunzer et al[14]2012United StatesMulti-center602Suppository, 50 mg after ERCP27 (9.1)52 (25.1)
Otsuka et al[5]2012JapanSingle center104Suppository, 50 mg before ERCP2 (3.9)10 (18.9)