Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 7, 2014; 20(33): 11886-11893
Published online Sep 7, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i33.11886
Published online Sep 7, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i33.11886
Table 3 Comparison of objective response rate, overall survival, progression-free survival and time-to-treatment failure between S-1-based chemotherapy and 5-FU-based or capecitabine-based chemotherapy
Subgroups | ORR | OS | PFS | TTF | ||||
RR (95%CI) | P value | HR (95%CI) | P value | HR (95%CI) | P value | HR (95%CI) | P value | |
S-1 vs 5-FU | 1.454 (1.038-2.036) | 0.029 | 0.895 (0.805-0.995) | 0.041 | 0.809 (0.635-1.030) | 0.086 | 0.832 (0.751-0.992) | 0 |
S-1 vs capecitabine | 0.952 (0.649-1.397) | 0.801 | 1.090 (0.803-1.481) | 0.579 | 1.036 (0.764-1.405) | 0.819 | Not applicable | Not applicable |
-
Citation: Yang J, Zhou Y, Min K, Yao Q, Xu CN. S-1-based
vs non-S-1-based chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: A meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(33): 11886-11893 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i33/11886.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i33.11886