Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 28, 2014; 20(32): 11182-11198
Published online Aug 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i32.11182
Published online Aug 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i32.11182
Table 4 Selected highlights
Selected recent advances | Genetic risk factors |
In 2009, the use of gene sequencing identified PALB2, which had previously been implicated in breast cancer, as a susceptibility gene for PDAC[28] | |
Expression of the palladin gene has been shown to be upregulated by cohabitance of normal fibroblasts with epithelial cells expressing the K-Ras oncogene. In 2012, it was shown that the palladin gene, which codes for a cytoskeletal protein, promotes mechanisms for metastasis and outgrowth of tumerogenic cells[90] | |
Also in 2012, gene sequencing indicated that ATM mutations result in a predisposition to PDAC; LOH was demonstrated in 2 kindreds with PDAC[77] | |
Therapy | |
For patients with diabetes, treatment with metformin is associated with a lower relative risk of pancreatic cancer[127,136,137] | |
A 2011 case report detailing a complete pathological response of a BRCA2-associated pancreatic tumor to gemcitabine plus iniparib showed the potential for PARP inhibitors in the treatment of BRCA2-associated pancreatic cancer[41]. Similar clinical trials are currently underway | |
Screening | Screening goals |
The goal of PDAC screening is the detection and treatment of (1) resectable PDAC; (2) PanIN-3 lesions; and (3) IPMN with high-grade dysplasia | |
Low prevalence and high risk cohort enrichment | |
The low absolute risk of PDAC development precludes population-wide screening from a cost-benefit and absolute harm perspective. The opportunity to screen high-risk cohorts will vastly increase the PPV of a screening test | |
Screening efforts | |
Past screening efforts, using patients cohorts at a high risk of developing PDAC, have demonstrated diagnostic yields from 1.1% to 50%, depending on their definition of yield (Table 3). Current screening modalities may be costly and invasive, and therefore associated with some patient risk. Furthermore, the long-term implications for detection of small and clinically insignificant lesions are uncertain. Further studies are needed to determine appropriate surveillance | |
Anticipated future advances and screening possibilities | Risk stratification |
Personal, family, genetic and environmental history will allow risk stratification and development of tailored screening and surveillance programs | |
Biomarkers | |
Ongoing research that suggests a future for gene expression profiling, proteomics, metabolomics, and microRNA as diagnostic PDAC biomarkers | |
Targeted therapy | |
As with BRCA2-associated tumors and PARP inhibitors, tumor biology will increasingly dictate the subsequent therapy |
- Citation: Becker AE, Hernandez YG, Frucht H, Lucas AL. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Risk factors, screening, and early detection. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(32): 11182-11198
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i32/11182.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i32.11182