Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 14, 2014; 20(30): 10620-10627
Published online Aug 14, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i30.10620
Published online Aug 14, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i30.10620
4-L SF-PEG n = 104 | 2-L PEG +Asc n = 102 | P value | |
Mean | Mean | ||
Patient who drank entire amount of bowel preparation | 78.60% | 92.20% | 0.0142 |
Patients who would choose bowel prep again | 78.40% | 86.10% | 0.1882 |
Patients who would recommend their bowel preparation | 82.70% | 86.30% | 0.4788 |
Patients who felt that the flavor of their bowel prep was pleasant | 70.90% | 59.80% | 0.0899 |
Patients satisfied with their bowel preparation process | 89.40% | 90.20% | 0.3183 |
Patients who had difficulty completing their prep | 25.00% | 22.00% | 0.6688 |
Symptoms: | |||
Bloating | 11.50% | 23.1 | 0.0235 |
Abdominal pain | 1.00% | 1.90% | 0.5495 |
Nausea | 23.10% | 21.20% | 0.7949 |
Vomiting | 2.90% | 3.80% | 0.6813 |
-
Citation: Rivas JM, Perez A, Hernandez M, Schneider A, Castro FJ. Efficacy of morning-only 4 liter sulfa free polyethylene glycol
vs 2 liter polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid for afternoon colonoscopy. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(30): 10620-10627 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i30/10620.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i30.10620