Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 14, 2014; 20(30): 10464-10469
Published online Aug 14, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i30.10464
Published online Aug 14, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i30.10464
Strategy 1 patients | Strategy 2 patients | P value | ||
(n = 83) | (n = 78) | |||
Age (yr) | 56 ± 9 | 57 ± 9 | t = 1,26 | 0.21 |
Sex (M/F) | 45/38 | 38/40 | χ2 = 0.49 | 0.48 |
Aetiology (alcohol-related/viral/other) | 47/34/2 | 45/28/5 | χ2 = 0.02 | 0.89 |
Hepatitis B surface antigen positive | 4 | 3 | corrχ2 = 0.01 | 0.93 |
Time since diagnosis of cirrhosis (yr) | 3.1 ± 2.7 | 2.9 ± 2.8 | t = 0.282 | 0.78 |
Time since diagnosis of varices (mo) | 2.9 ± 2.4 | 2.8 ± 2.5 | t = 0.022 | 0.98 |
Child-Pugh score | 6 (IQR: 5-8) | 7 (IQR: 6-8) | Z = - 0.87 | 0.38 |
Ascites | 18 | 23 | χ2 = 1.29 | 0.26 |
Follow-up time (mo) | 36 ± 18 | 35 ± 15 | t = 0.325 | 0.75 |
-
Citation: Di Pascoli L, Buja A, Bolognesi M, Montagnese S, Gatta A, Gregori D, Merkel C. Cost-effectiveness analysis of beta-blockers
vs endoscopic surveillance in patients with cirrhosis and small varices. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(30): 10464-10469 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i30/10464.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i30.10464