Liver metastases: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound compared with computed tomography and magnetic resonance

doi:10.3748/wjg.v20.i29.9998

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 20, Issue 29

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (9555)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-2) series, Tables (1-1) series.

Item

Count

PDF

600

WORD

446

HTML

5550

Figures (1-2)

224

Tables (1-1)

212

Sum=7032

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

1199

Download

1324

Sum=2523

Aug 7, 2014 (publication date) through Nov 7, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (61)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Review

World J Gastroenterol. Aug 7, 2014; 20(29): 9998-10007
Published online Aug 7, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i29.9998

Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 1 Baseline ultrasound did not detect any lesion (A), while contrast enhanced ultrasound clearly showed one hypoenhancing lesion (B) (arrow).

Citation: Cantisani V, Grazhdani H, Fioravanti C, Rosignuolo M, Calliada F, Messineo D, Bernieri MG, Redler A, Catalano C, D’Ambrosio F. Liver metastases: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound compared with computed tomography and magnetic resonance. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(29): 9998-10007
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i29/9998.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i29.9998