Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 7, 2014; 20(29): 10183-10192
Published online Aug 7, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i29.10183
Published online Aug 7, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i29.10183
Table 2 Quality assessment of the randomized controlled trials in the meta-analysis
| Ref. | Randomization | Blinding | Concealed allocation | Baseline features | Eligibility criteria | Loss tofollow-up | Selecting bias | Study quality |
| Hulscher et al[12] | Yes | No | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Fair |
| Omloo et al[14] | Yes | No | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Fair |
| Sasako et al[15] | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Fair |
-
Citation: Wei MT, Zhang YC, Deng XB, Yang TH, He YZ, Wang ZQ. Transthoracic
vs transhiatal surgery for cancer of the esophagogastric junction: A meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(29): 10183-10192 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i29/10183.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i29.10183