Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 7, 2014; 20(29): 10151-10157
Published online Aug 7, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i29.10151
Published online Aug 7, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i29.10151
Table 1 Comparison of the two groups of patients according to patient and investigation characteristics (n = 665) n (%)
| Patient and investigation characteristics | Indomethacin group(n = 347) | Control group(n = 318) |
| Gender | ||
| Male (n = 239) | 133 (55.64) | 106 (44.35) |
| Female (n = 426) | 214 (50.23) | 212 (49.76) |
| Age | ||
| < 70 yr (n = 355) | 190 (53.52) | 165 (46.48) |
| > 70 yr (n = 310) | 157 (50.65) | 153 (49.35) |
| BMI | ||
| < 25 (n = 303) | 156 (51.48) | 147 (48.51) |
| 25-30 (n = 236) | 125 (53.96) | 111 (47.03) |
| > 30 (n = 126) | 66 (52.38) | 60 (47.62) |
| Duration of ERCP | ||
| < 20 min (n = 454) | 236 (52.0) | 218 (48.0) |
| > 20 min (n = 211) | 111 (52.6) | 100 (47.4) |
| Dilated/non-dilated bile duct | ||
| Dilated (n = 366) | 189 (51.64) | 177 (48.36) |
| Non-dilated (n = 299) | 158 (52.84) | 141 (47.15) |
| Pancreatic duct opacification (n = 463) | 246 (53.13) | 217 (46.87) |
| EST | ||
| Biliary (n = 443) | 224 (50.56) | 219 (49.43) |
| Pancreatic/double (n = 48) | 22 (44.0) | 28 (56.0) |
| Difficult cannulation (n = 116) | 64 (55.17) | 52 (44.83) |
| Gallstone extraction (n = 165) | 82 (49.7) | 83 (50.3) |
| Bile duct dilatation (n = 22) | 11 (50.0) | 11 (50.0) |
| Biliary stent placement | ||
| Plastic stent (n = 75) | 35 (46.7) | 40 (53.3) |
| Metal stent | 0 | 0 |
- Citation: Döbrönte Z, Szepes Z, Izbéki F, Gervain J, Lakatos L, Pécsi G, Ihász M, Lakner L, Toldy E, Czakó L. Is rectal indomethacin effective in preventing of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis? World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(29): 10151-10157
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i29/10151.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i29.10151