Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 28, 2014; 20(28): 9476-9485
Published online Jul 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i28.9476
Published online Jul 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i28.9476
Table 1 Comparison of tumor formation and tumor intra-abdominal implantation between the two methods
| Time after injection | Group | No. of mice | No. of tumor formed mice | Tumor formation rate | P value | No. of tumor implanted mice | Tumor implantation rate (100%) | P value |
| Two weeks | Matrigel group | 8 | 8 | 100.0% | 0.007 | |||
| PBS group | 8 | 2 | 25.0% | |||||
| Three weeks | Matrigel group | 8 | 8 | 100.0% | 0.026 | 1 | 12.5% | 0.041 |
| PBS group | 8 | 3 | 37.5% | 6 | 75.0% |
- Citation: Jiang YJ, Lee CL, Wang Q, Zhou ZW, Yang F, Jin C, Fu DL. Establishment of an orthotopic pancreatic cancer mouse model: Cells suspended and injected in Matrigel. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(28): 9476-9485
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i28/9476.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i28.9476