Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 28, 2014; 20(28): 9374-9383
Published online Jul 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i28.9374
Published online Jul 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i28.9374
Ref. | Study type | CT regimen | Patients (n) | Resection rate (%) | R0 resections rate (%) | OS median (mo) |
Heinrich et al[66] | Prospective non-randomized phase II | Gemcitabine + cisplatin | 28 | 93 | 80 | 26.5 |
Tajima et al[68] | Pilot study | S1 vs upfront surgery | 34 (total) 13 (S1) vs 21 (upfront surgery) | 100 | 84.6 vs 85.7 | 2 yr 55.6% vs 29.6% |
Sho et al[69] | Single centre | GEM CRT (external beam 50 to 54 Gy) | 61 | 97 | 92 | NR |
Van Buren et al[70] | Prospective phase II trial | FDR GEM + bevacizumab induction | 59 | 72.8 | 38/43 (88.3%) | 16. 8 (overall) |
GEM + bevacizumab Accelerated RT 30 Gy/10 fractions | 19.7 (resected patients) |
- Citation: Polistina F, Natale GD, Bonciarelli G, Ambrosino G, Frego M. Neoadjuvant strategies for pancreatic cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(28): 9374-9383
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i28/9374.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i28.9374