Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 21, 2014; 20(27): 9055-9071
Published online Jul 21, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i27.9055
Published online Jul 21, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i27.9055
Ref. | Study population and sample size | Diagnosis | Outcome | Main results |
Schwimmer et al[21] | Children (n = 817) who died of external causes from 1993 to 2003; 15% with NAFLD | Autoptic liver biopsy | Atherosclerosis was assessed as absent, mild (aorta only), moderate (coronary artery streaks/plaques), or severe (coronary artery narrowing) | For the entire cohort, mild atherosclerosis was present in 21% and moderate to severe in 2%. Atherosclerosis was significantly more common in children with fatty liver than those without (30% vs 19%, P < 0.001) |
Schwimmer et al[9] | Overweight children with (n = 150), and without (n = 150) NAFLD, matched for gender, age, and severity of obesity | Liver biopsy | Prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors (abdominal obesity, dyslipidemia, hypertension, IR, and glucose abnormalities) | NAFLD was strongly associated with multiple cardiovascular risk factors independently of both BMI and hyperinsulinemia |
Pacifico et al[22] | Obese children with (n = 29), and without NAFLD (n = 33); healthy lean controls (n = 30) | Liver ultrasound | cIMT, mean (95%CI) | NAFLD vs no NAFLD and controls: 0.58 (0.54-0.62) mm vs 0.49 (0.46-0.52) mm and 0.40 (0.36-0.43) mm; P < 0.01 and P < 0.0005, respectively Log cIMT was associated with NAFLD severity in a multiple linear regression analysis adjusted for age, gender, Tanner stage, and cardiovascular risk factors Coefficient b, 0.08; P < 0.0005 |
Demircioğlu et al[23] | Obese children with mild (n = 32), moderate-severe NAFLD (n = 22), and without NAFLD (n = 26); healthy lean controls (n = 30) matched for age and gender | Liver ultrasound | cIMT, mean ± SD | All obese vs controls: |
Left CCA, 0.414 ± 0.071 mm vs 0.352 ± 0.054 mm, P < 0.0001 | ||||
Left CB, 0.412 ± 0.067 mm vs 0.350 ± 0.058 mm, P < 0.0001 | ||||
Left ICA, 0.324 ± 0.068 mm vs 0.266 ± 0.056 mm, P < 0.0001 | ||||
NAFLD was significantly associated with left CCA, CB, ICA in multiple regression linear analyses adjusted for age, gender, weight, mean ALT level, TC, obesity, and grade of hepatosteatosis | ||||
CCA = standardized β, 0.451; P = 0.01 | ||||
CB = standardized β, 0.627; P < 0.0001 | ||||
ICA = standardized β, 0.501; P = 0.020 | ||||
Kelishadi et al[24] | Obese adolescents with (n = 25), and without (n = 25) components of MetS; normal weight adolescents with (n = 25) and without (n = 25) components of MetS | Liver ultrasound and elevated ALT | cIMT, mean ± SD | NWMN vs NWMA vs POMN vs POMA: 0.29 ± 0.02 mm vs 0.37 ± 0.04 mm vs 0.41 ± 0.05 mm; the differences were significant between groups with the exception of NWMA vs POMN |
cIMT was significantly associated with NAFLD in a logistic regression analysis after adjustment for age, gender and pubertal status | ||||
Odds ratio, 1.2 (95%CI: 1.03-2.1) | ||||
Manco et al[25] | Overweight and obese children with (n = 31), and without (n = 49) NAFLD, matched for age, gender, and BMI | Liver biopsy | cIMT, median (IQR) | NAFLD vs no NAFLD: |
Right cIMT, 0.47 (0.07) mm vs 0.48 (0.05) mm, P = 0.659 | ||||
Left cIMT, 0.49 (0.12) mm vs 0.47 (0.05) mm, P = 0.039 | ||||
NAFLD was not associated with cIMT in a multivariate analysis | ||||
Caserta et al[26] | Randomly selected adolescents (n = 642) of whom 30.5% and 13.5% were, respectively, overweight and obese. Overall prevalence of NAFLD, 12.5% | Liver ultrasound | cIMT, mean (95%CI) | NAFLD vs no NAFLD: 0.417 (0.409-0.425) mm vs 0.395 (0.392-0.397) mm, P < 0.001 |
NAFLD was significantly associated with cIMT in a multivariate analysis after adjustment for age, BP, BMI, TG, c-HDL, TC, IR, MetS, grade of steatosis | ||||
Standardized β, 0.0147 (95%CI: 0.0054-0.0240); P = 0.002 | ||||
Pacifico et al[14] | Obese children with (n = 100), and without (n = 150) NAFLD; healthy lean controls (n = 150) | Liver ultrasound and elevated ALT | cIMT and FMD, mean (95%CI) | Controls and no NAFLD vs NAFLD: cIMT, 0.47 (0.46-0.48) mm and 0.52 (0.50-0.54) mm vs 0.55 (0.53-0.54) mm, P < 0.0001 and P < 0.01, respectively |
FMD, 15.0 (13.9-17.3) and 11.8 (10.1-13.7) vs 6.7 (5.0-8.6) %, P < 0.01 and P < 0.001 respectively | ||||
NAFLD was associated with low FMD and increased cIMT in a multiple logistic regression analysis after adjustment for age, gender, Tanner stage, and MetS | ||||
Odds ratio, 2.31 (95%CI: 1.35-3.97); P = 0.002 and 1.99 (95%CI: 1.18-3.38); P = 0.010, respectively | ||||
Nobili et al[27] | Children with NAFLD (n = 118) | Liver biopsy | Atherogenic lipid profile (TG/HDL-c, TC/HDL-c and LDL-c/HDL-c ratios) | The severity of liver injury was strongly associated with a more atherogenic profile, independently of BMI, insulin resistance, and the presence of MetS |
Weghuber et al[28] | Obese children with (n = 14), and without (n = 14) NAFLD | Proton MR spectroscopy | FMD, mean ± SD | NAFLD vs no NAFLD: 108.6% ± 11.8% vs 110.7% ± 9.0%; P = 0.41 |
El-Koofy et al[29] | Overweight/obese children (n = 33) | Liver biopsy | Atherogenic lipid profile (TC, LDL-c, HDL-c, TG) | Children with NAFLD had significantly higher TC, LDL-c, TG and lower HDL-c compared to patients with normal liver histology (P < 0.05) |
Sert et al[30] | Obese children with (n = 44), and without (n = 36) NAFLD; lean subjects (n = 37) | Liver ultrasound and elevated ALT | cIMT, mean ± SD | Lean and no NAFLD vs NAFLD: 0.0359 ± 0.012 mm vs 0.378 ± 0.017 mm vs 0.440 ± 0.026 mm, P < 0.05 and P < 0.05, respectively |
Akın et al[31] | Obese children with (n = 56), and without (n = 101) NAFLD | Liver ultrasound | cIMT, mean (95%CI) | NAFLD vs no NAFLD: 0.48 (0.47-0.49) mm vs 0.45 (0.44-0.45) mm, P < 0.001 |
NAFLD was the only variable associated with increased cIMT in a multiple regression adjusted for age and gender | ||||
β, 0.031 [SE (β) = 0.008]; P < 0.001 | ||||
Gökçe et al[32] | Obese children with (n = 50), and without (n = 30) NAFLD; healthy lean controls (n = 30) | Liver ultrasound | cIMT, mean ± SD | NAFLD vs no NAFLD vs control group: |
Right cIMT, 0.46 ± 0.21 mm vs 0.35 ± 0.09 mm vs 0.30 ± 0.13 mm, P < 0.01 | ||||
Left cIMT, 0.44 ± 0.09 mm vs 0.35 ± 0.08 mm vs 0.27 ± 0.04 mm, P < 0.01 | ||||
NAFLD was the only variable associated with increased cIMT in a multiple regression adjusted for age, gender, BMI, BP, TG, HDL-c, IR and MetS | ||||
Right cIMT = β, 0.241; P < 0.05 | ||||
Left cIMT = β, 0.425; P < 0.01 | ||||
Sert et al[33] | Obese children with (n = 97), and without (n = 83) NAFLD; lean subjects (n = 68) | Liver ultrasound and elevated ALT | cIMT, mean ± SD | Lean and no NAFLD vs NAFLD: 0.354 ± 0.009 mm vs 0.383 ± 0.019 mm vs 0.437 ± 0.028 mm; P < 0.05 and P < 0.05, respectively |
Alp et al[34] | Obese children with (n = 93), and without (n = 307) NAFLD; healthy lean controls (n = 150) | Liver ultrasound | cIMT, mean ± SD | Severe NAFLD vs mild NAFLD vs no NAFLD vs controls: 0.09 ± 0.01 cm vs 0.10 ± 0.01 cm vs 0.09 ± 0.01 cm vs 0.06 ± 0.01 cm, P < 0.001 |
Huang et al[35] | Adolescents (n = 964) | Liver ultrasound | PWV, mean ± SD | No NAFLD, low metabolic risk vs NAFLD, low metabolic risk vs no NAFLD, high metabolic risk vs NAFLD, high metabolic risk: males, 6.6 ± 0.7 m/s vs 6.7 ± 0.6 m/s vs 6.9 ± 1.0 m/s; females, 6.2 ± 0.7 m/s vs 6.3 ± 0.7 m/s vs 6.5 ± 0.7 m/s vs 6.4 ± 0.6 m/s |
Males and females who had NAFLD in the presence of the metabolic cluster had greater PWV | ||||
b, 0.20 (95%CI: 0.01-0.38); P = 0.037 | ||||
Jin et al[36] | Obese children (n = 71), and healthy controls (n = 47) | Liver ultrasound | PWV, mean ± SD | Obese vs controls: 4.54 ± 0.66 m/s vs 3.70 ± 0.66 m/s, P < 0.001 |
Fatty liver was positively correlated with PWV (P < 0.01) |
- Citation: Pacifico L, Chiesa C, Anania C, Merulis AD, Osborn JF, Romaggioli S, Gaudio E. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and the heart in children and adolescents. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(27): 9055-9071
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i27/9055.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i27.9055