Impact of tumor location on clinical outcomes of gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection

doi:10.3748/wjg.v20.i26.8631

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 20, Issue 26

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (4688)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Tables (1-6) series.

Item

Count

PDF

305

WORD

245

HTML

2554

Tables (1-6)

181

Sum=3285

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

760

Download

643

Sum=1403

Jul 14, 2014 (publication date) through Jul 31, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (24)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Retrospective Study

World J Gastroenterol. Jul 14, 2014; 20(26): 8631-8637
Published online Jul 14, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i26.8631

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of gastric tumors n (%)

Characteristic	Value
Gender (female:male)	1:2.18 (454:989)
Age, yr, mean ± SD	63.0 ± 9.4
Tumor size, mm
< 20	1034 (71.7)
≥ 20	409 (28.3)
Macroscopic appearance
Elevated	310 (21.5)
Flat	128 (8.9)
Depressed	90 (6.2)
Mixed	915 (63.4)
Ulcer	71 (4.9)
Invasion depth
Mucosa	612 (42.4)
Submucosa	106 (7.3)
LocationI
Lower third	1233 (85.4)
Middle third	112 (7.8)
Upper third	98 (6.8)
Location II
Anterior wall	294 (20.4)
Lesser curvature	481 (33.3)
Posterior wall	405 (28.1)
Greater curvature	263 (18.2)
Histology
Low grade dysplasia	534 (37.0)
High grade dysplasia	176 (12.2)
Differentiated EGC	655 (45.4)
Undifferentiated EGC	78 (5.4)
Procedure time, min	61.8 (± 47.0)
Curability
Complete resection	1287 (89.0)
Incomplete resection	156 (11.0)
Resectability
En bloc	1318 (91.3)
Piecemeal	125 (8.7)
Perforation	39 (2.7)
Post-ESD bleeding	63 (4.3)

EGC: Early gastric cancer; ESD: Endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Citation: Yoon JY, Shim CN, Chung SH, Park W, Chung H, Lee H, Shin SK, Lee SK, Lee YC, Park JC. Impact of tumor location on clinical outcomes of gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(26): 8631-8637
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i26/8631.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i26.8631