Endoscopic ultrasound-guided treatments: Are we getting evidence based - a systematic review

Table 3 Endoscopic ultrasound-guided necrosectomy

Ref.	Design	Cases	Technical success	Clinical success	Recurrence	Complications1
Seewald et al[70]	RS	13	100%	85%	15%	30%
Charnley et al[71]	RS	13	100%	92%	0%	None
Voermans et al[72]	RS	25	100%	93%	7%	40%
Hocke et al[73]	RS	30	97%	83%	3%	23%
Schrover et al[74]	RS	8	100 %	75%	12%	25%
Mathew et al[75]	RS	6	100%	100%	0%	None
Escourrou et al[76]	RS	13	100%	100%	0%	46%
Jürgensen et al[77]	RS	35	100%	97%	0%	17%
Bakker et al[78]	RCT	10	100%	100%	20%	40%
Will et al[79]	RS	18	100%	100%	11%	17%
Rische et al[61]	RS	22	100%	86%	14%	36%
Yamamoto et al[80]	RS	4	100%	50%	NR	25%
Hritz et al[81]	RS	4	100%	100%	0%	None
Yasuda et al[82]	RS	57	100%	75%	7%	33%
Ang et al[83]	RS	8	100%	87%	13%	None
Sarkaria et al[84]	RS	17	100%	88%	0%	6%
Total	16 studies	283	100% (97%-100%)	88% (50%-100%)	7% (0%-20%)	28% (0%-46%)

¹Complications include: early and late, procedural and stent related. RCT: Randomized controlled trial; PS: Prospective study; RS: Retrospective study; NR: Not reported.