Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 14, 2014; 20(26): 8424-8448
Published online Jul 14, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i26.8424
Published online Jul 14, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i26.8424
Ref. | Design | Indications | Techniques | Technical success | Rebleeding | Complications |
Fockens et al[229] | RS | Dieulafoy’s lesion (n = 4) | Polidocanol injection | 4/4 (100) | 2/4 (50) | None |
Levy et al[234] | RS | Dieulafoy’s lesion (n = 1) | Alcohol 99% injection | 1/1 (100) | No | None |
Gonzalez et al[235] | RS | Dieulafoy’s lesion (n = 2) | Polidocanol | 2/2 (100) | No | None |
or CYA injection | ||||||
Levy et al[234] | RS | Various (n = 4) | Alcohol 99% or CYA injection | 4/4 (100) | No | None |
Gonzalez et al[235] | RS | Pseudo-aneurysm (n = 3) | CYA injection | 3/3 (100) | No | None |
Gonzalez et al[235] | RS | Gastric varices (n = 2) | CYA injection | 2/2 (100) | No | None |
Lee et al[231] | RS | Gastric varices (n = 101) | EUS-assisted CYA injection | - | Early 4/54 (7.4) | None |
Late 10/54 (18) | ||||||
Lahoti et al[236] | RS | Esophageal varices (n = 5) | Sclerotherapy | 5/5 (100) | No | 1 esophageal stricture |
Romero-Castro et al[237] | RS | Gastric varices (n = 5) | CYA injection | 5/5 (100) | No | None |
De Paulo et al[230] | RCT | Esophageal varices (n = 50) | Endo vs EUS-guided CYA injection | 24/25 (96) | 2/24 recurrence of varices (8.3) | None |
Levy et al[238] | RS | Choledochojejunal anastomotic varices (n = 1) | Coil embolization | 1/1 (100) | No | None |
Romero-Castro et al[239] | RS | Gastric varices (n = 4) | Coil embolization | 3/4 (75) | No | None |
Binmoeller et al[233] | RS | Gastric varices (n = 30) | CYA injection + coil embolization | 30/30 (100) | 4/24 (16.6) | None |
Romero-Castro et al[232] | RS | Gastric varices (n = 30) | CYA injection (n = 19) vs coils (n = 11) | 97.4 % vs 90.9% | NR | 9 CYA embolization; |
1 chest pain; 1 fever; | ||||||
1 variceal bleeding | ||||||
Weilert et al[240] | RS | Rectal varices (n = 1) | CYA injection plus coils | 100% | No | None |
Gonzalez et al[241] | RS | Splenic artery aneurism (n = 1) | CYA injection | 1/1 (100) | No | None |
Roberts et al[242] | RS | Visceral pseudoaneurysm (n = 1) | HistoAcryl injection | 1/1 (100) | No | None |
Roach et al[243] | RS | SMA aneurysm (n = 1) | Thrombin injection | 1/1 (100) | No | None |
Chaves et al[244] | RS | SMA aneurysm (n = 1) | Thrombin injection | 1/1 (100) | No | None |
Robinson et al[245] | RS | Splenic artery aneurysm (n = 1) | Thrombin injection | 1/1 (100) | No | None |
Lameris et al[246] | RS | Visceral pseudoaneurysm (n = 1) | Thrombin + collagen injection | 1/1 (100) | No | None |
- Citation: Fabbri C, Luigiano C, Lisotti A, Cennamo V, Virgilio C, Caletti G, Fusaroli P. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided treatments: Are we getting evidence based - a systematic review. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(26): 8424-8448
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i26/8424.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i26.8424