Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 7, 2014; 20(25): 8274-8281
Published online Jul 7, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i25.8274
Published online Jul 7, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i25.8274
Study | Selection | Comparability | Outcome | ||||||
Representativeness of exposed cohort | Selection of non-exposed cohort | Exposure | Outcome of interest not present at start | Comparability of laparoscopic vs open | Assessment of outcome | Follow-up | Adequacy of follow-up/missing data | Score | |
Kanazawa et al[18] | Truly representative | Same | Surgical records | Yes | No restrictions, not matched | Record linkage | 5 yr | Unclear | 7 |
Cheung et al[23] | Truly representative | Same | Surgical records | Yes | No restrictions, matched | Record linkage | 5 yr | None | 8 |
Truant et al[33] | Truly representative | Same | Surgical records | Yes | Restricted to subcapsular tumours located in the anterior or lateral segments II-VI, matched | Record linkage | 5 yr | Unclear | 7 |
Belli et al[32] | Truly representative | Same | Surgical records | Yes | Restricted in exophytic or subcapsular tumours, no matching | Record linkage | 3 yr | Unclear | 7 |
-
Citation: Twaij A, Pucher PH, Sodergren MH, Gall T, Darzi A, Jiao LR. Laparoscopic
vs open approach to resection of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with known cirrhosis: Systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(25): 8274-8281 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i25/8274.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i25.8274