Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 7, 2014; 20(25): 8244-8252
Published online Jul 7, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i25.8244
Published online Jul 7, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i25.8244
Table 3 Risk factors associated with all levels of complication grade
| Characteristic | Grade I | Grade II | Grade III | |||
| Multivariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||||
| HR (95%CI) | P value | HR (95%CI) | P value | HR (95%CI) | P value | |
| Lymph node metastasis | 1.947 (1.506-2.517) | < 0.001 | 1.577 (1.208-2.058) | 0.001 | ||
| Age | 1.751 (1.044-2.939) | 0.034 | ||||
| Tumor size | 1.913 (1.059-3.453) | 0.031 | ||||
| Intraoperative blood loss | 1.850 (1.063-3.222) | 0.030 | 2.099 (1.288-3.421) | 0.003 | ||
| TNM stage | 1.607 (1.158-2.228) | 0.005 | ||||
| Chemotherapy | 2.354 (1.451-3.819) | < 0.001 | ||||
- Citation: Jiang N, Deng JY, Ding XW, Zhang L, Liu HG, Liang YX, Liang H. Effect of complication grade on survival following curative gastrectomy for carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(25): 8244-8252
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i25/8244.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i25.8244