Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 28, 2014; 20(24): 7971-7978
Published online Jun 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i24.7971
Table 2 Summary of odds ratios and 95%CIs in this meta-analysis
ItemsOR
Heterogeneity
OR (95%CI)P valueQ2t2I2(%)P value
Ciculating populations of Tregs between HCC patients and health controls1.868 (1.489-2.344)0539.280.274196.10
Populations of Tregs in the tumor and surrounding tissues4.040 (2.094-7.794)0133.410.525097.00
Populations of Tregs in the tumor and the normal liver tissues2.869 (2.157-3.817)03.770.028246.90.152
Populations of Tregs among HCC patients with different tumor numbers (one tumor mass or more)1.670 (0.879-3.171)0.11794.910.313897.90
Populations of Tregs among HCC patients with different tumor sizes (smaller or larger than 5 cm)1.170 (0.844-1.620)0.346102.410.132596.10
6 Populations of Tregs between HCC patients with or without capsule1.073 (0.798-1.442)0.64261.480.068295.10
Populations of Tregs among HCC patients in different TNM stages (I/II vs III/IV)0.646 (0.207-2.021)0.453365.991.333899.20
Populations of Tregs between HCC patients with or without HBV infection1.189 (0.904-1.564)0.21645.020.085691.10
Populations of Tregs among HCC patients with different AFP levels (lower or higher than 20 ng/mL)1.458 (0.714-2.975)0.3143.210.391698.60