Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 28, 2014; 20(24): 7819-7829
Published online Jun 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i24.7819
Published online Jun 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i24.7819
Table 4 Biomarkers in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
Biomarker | Prognostic biomarker | Predictive biomarker | Comments and references |
MUC1 | Yes | Predictive of early cancer-related death[37] | |
MSLN | Yes | Predictive of early cancer-related death[37] | |
6-gene signature | Yes | Expression of FOSB, KLF6, NFKBIZ, ATP4A, GSG1 and SIGLEC11 is related with metastatic spread[38] | |
VEGF | Yes | Worse survival in resected PDA[39] | |
p16 | Yes | Higher expression was related to poorer prognosis[40] | |
TP53 | Yes | Relation with tumour dedifferentiation and higher locorregional recurrence[40] | |
SMAD4 | Yes | Higher Smad4/Dpc4 was related to bigger tumours, lymph node metastases and shorter survival[40]. Higher relapse rate (distant spread)[41]. Loss of expression correlated with resectability and better survival after surgery[42] | |
EGFR | No predictive/prognostic power[43,44] | ||
K-ras | Yes | Better prognosis in Kras wild-type tumours[43,44] | |
RRM1 | Yes | Yes | High expression of RRM1 showed significantly better overall survival[45-47] and worse response to treatment[47-49] |
ERCC1 | Yes | High ERCC1 expression showed significantly better overall survival[47,50,51]. No predictive power[49] | |
CTCs | Yes | More studies are awaited[52] | |
hENT1 | Yes | Yes | High expression of hNENt1: worse prognosis, higher response to gemcitabine in the adjuvant setting; unclear impact in metastatic patients[50,53-57] |
HuR | Yes | Yes | Low expression of HuR: worse prognosis[58] and better response to gemcitabine[59,60] |
SPARC | Yes | Expression of SPARC in the peritumoural stroma is related with worse prognosis[61,62]. No predictive effect | |
CTGF | Preclinical data seem to suggest prognostic impact and potential predictive power for FB-3019[63-66] |
- Citation: Lamarca A, Feliu J. Pancreatic biomarkers: Could they be the answer? World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(24): 7819-7829
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i24/7819.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i24.7819