Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 14, 2014; 20(22): 7040-7048
Published online Jun 14, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i22.7040
Published online Jun 14, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i22.7040
Table 1 Main characteristics of the included studies
Ref. | Jadad | Total (n) | Risk factors/procedures | Stent type | Time for spontaneous dislodgement |
Kawaguch et al[16] | 4 | 120 | History of previous PEP, difficult cannulation, SOD | 5F (3 cm) | 3 d 96.7% (58/60) |
Lee et al[17] | 5 | 101 | Difficult cannulation | 3F (4, 6, 8 cm) | 7 d 94% (45/48) |
Pan et al[18] | 2 | 40 | High-risk patients without | 5F | NA |
Sofuni et al[14] | 5 | 407 | High-risk patients irrespective of the type of the risk factor | 5F (3 cm) | 3 d 95.7% (178/186) |
Ito et al[19] | 4 | 70 | Difficult cannulation | 5F (4 cm) | NA |
Sofuni et al[15] | 3 | 201 | High-risk patients irrespective of the type of the risk factor | 5F (3 cm) | 3 d 95.7% (90/94) |
Tsuchiya et al[20] | 3 | 64 | Bile duct sphincterotomy | 5F (3, 4 cm) | NA |
Harewood et al[21] | 4 | 19 | Endoscopic ampullectomy | 5F (3, 5 cm) | 1 d 60% (6/10) |
Fazel et al[22] | 2 | 74 | Difficult cannulation, SOM, billiy ES | 5F (2 cm) | NA |
Tarnasky et al[23] | 2 | 80 | SOD, SOM | 5F or 7F (2, 2.5 cm) | NA |
- Citation: Shi QQ, Ning XY, Zhan LL, Tang GD, Lv XP. Placement of prophylactic pancreatic stents to prevent post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis in high-risk patients: A meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(22): 7040-7048
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i22/7040.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i22.7040