Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 7, 2014; 20(21): 6626-6631
Published online Jun 7, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i21.6626
Published online Jun 7, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i21.6626
Table 2 Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio of controlled attenuation parameter best cut-off values
| Sensitivity% (95%CI) | Specificity% (95%CI) | PPV% (95%CI) | NPV% (95%CI) | +LR (95%CI) | -LR (95%CI) | |
| S ≥ 1 | 91.1 (78.8-97.5) | 51.6 (38.7-64.2) | 56.9 (44.7-68.6) | 89.2 (74.3-97.0) | 1.88 (1.4-2.5) | 0.17 (0.07-0.5) |
| S ≥ 2 | 60.0 (32.3-83.7) | 91.5 (83.9-96.3) | 52.9 (27.8-77.0) | 93.5 (86.3-97.6) | 7.05 (3.2-15.4) | 0.44 (0.2-0.8) |
- Citation: Ferraioli G, Tinelli C, Lissandrin R, Zicchetti M, Dal Bello B, Filice G, Filice C. Controlled attenuation parameter for evaluating liver steatosis in chronic viral hepatitis. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(21): 6626-6631
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i21/6626.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i21.6626