Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 7, 2014; 20(21): 6608-6614
Published online Jun 7, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i21.6608
Published online Jun 7, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i21.6608
Table 4 Diagnostic performance of positron emission tomography/computerized tomography and computerized tomography in patients with various carcinoembryonic antigen levels
CEA level (ng/mL) | CT (%) | PET/CT (%) | ||||
Sensitivity | Specificity | Accuracy | Sensitivity | Specificity | Accuracy | |
≤ 3.4 (n = 26) | 57.1 (8/14) | 75 (9/12) | 65.4 (17/26) | 83.3 (10/12) | 85.7 (12/14) | 84.6 (22/26) |
3.4-10 (n = 29) | 78.3 (18/23) | 66.7 (4/6) | 75.9 (22/29) | 96 (24/25) | 75 (3/4) | 93.1 (27/29) |
10-30 (n = 34) | 86.7 (26/30) | 75 (3/4) | 85.3 (29/34) | 96.7 (29/30) | 75 (3/4) | 94.1 (32/34) |
> 30 (n = 17) | 93.8 (15/16) | 100 (1/1) | 94.1 (16/17) | 100 (16/16) | 100 (1/1) | 100 (17/17) |
- Citation: Zhang Y, Feng B, Zhang GL, Hu M, Fu Z, Zhao F, Zhang XL, Kong L, Yu JM. Value of 18F-FDG PET-CT in surveillance of postoperative colorectal cancer patients with various carcinoembryonic antigen concentrations. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(21): 6608-6614
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i21/6608.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i21.6608