Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. May 28, 2014; 20(20): 6092-6101
Published online May 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i20.6092
Published online May 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i20.6092
Clinical trial | Type | Treatment | ORR | PFS (mo) | OS (mo) |
Fuchs et al[39] (2007) | Phase III | CapeIRI1vs FOLFIRI vs mIFL | 38.6% vs 47.2% vs 43.3% | 5.8 vs 7.6 (1) vs 5.9 (2) | 18.9 vs 23.1 (3) vs 17.6 |
Köhne et al[34] (2008)2 | Phase III | CAPIRI vs FOLFIRI-2 | 5.9 vs 9.6 | 14.75 vs 19.9 | |
+ Celecoxib | 22% vs 32% | ||||
- Celecoxib | 48% vs 45% | ||||
Souglakos et al[40] (2012) | Phase II | CAPIRI + Bev vs FOLFIRI-2 + Bev | 39.8% vs 45.5% (P = 0.32) | 8.9 vs 10.0 (P = 0.64) | 27.5 vs 25.7 (P = 0.55) |
Pectasides et al[41] (2012) | Phase III | XELIRI + Bev vs FOLFIRI + Bev | 38.5% vs 40.1% (P = 0.81) | 10.2 vs 10.8 (P = 0.74) | 20.0 vs 25.3 (P = 0.099) |
Ducreux et al[42] (2013) | Phase II | XELIRI-2+ Bev vs FOLFIRI + Bev | 62% vs 63% | 9 vs 9 | 23 vs 23 |
- Citation: Aguado C, García-Paredes B, Sotelo MJ, Sastre J, Díaz-Rubio E. Should capecitabine replace 5-fluorouracil in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer? World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(20): 6092-6101
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i20/6092.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i20.6092