Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. May 28, 2014; 20(20): 6092-6101
Published online May 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i20.6092
Published online May 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i20.6092
Clinical trial | Type | Treatment | ORR | PFS (mo) | OS (mo) |
Díaz-Rubio et al[20] (2007) | Phase III | XELOX vs FUOX | 37% vs 46% (P = 0.154) | 8.9 vs 9.5 (HR = 1.18, P = 0.153) | 18.1 vs 20.8 (HR 1.22, P = 0.145) |
Cassidy et al[45] (2008) | Phase III | XELOX vs FOLFOX-4+/- Bev | 47% vs 48% (OR 0.94) | 8 vs 8.5 (HR = 1.04)1 | 19.8 vs 19.6 (HR = 0.99) |
Ducreux et al[42] (2011) | Phase III | XELOX vs FOLFOX-6 | 42% vs 46% | 8.8 vs 9.3 (HR = 1) | 19.9 vs 20.5 (HR = 1.02) |
Porschen et al[22] (2007) | Phase III | CAPOX vs FUFOX | 48% vs 54% (P = 0.7) | 7.1 vs 8.0 (HR = 1.17, P = 0.117) | 16.8 vs 18.8 (HR = 1.12, P = 0.26) |
Comella et al[23] (2009) | Phase III | OXXEL vs OXAFAFU | 34% vs 33% (P = 0.999) | 6.6 vs 6.5 (HR = 1.12, P = 0.354) | 16.0 vs 17.1 (HR = 1.01, P = 0.883) |
Hochster et al[25] (2008) | Phase II | XELOX vs FOLFOX-6 vs bFOL+ Bev | 27% vs 41% vs 20%; 46% vs 52% vs 39% | 5.9 vs 8.7 vs 6.9; 10.3 vs 9.9 vs 8.3 | 17.2 vs 19.2 vs 17.9; 24.6 vs 26.1 vs 20.4 |
- Citation: Aguado C, García-Paredes B, Sotelo MJ, Sastre J, Díaz-Rubio E. Should capecitabine replace 5-fluorouracil in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer? World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(20): 6092-6101
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i20/6092.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i20.6092