Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastroenterol. May 28, 2014; 20(20): 6092-6101
Published online May 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i20.6092
Published online May 28, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i20.6092
Clinical trial | Type | Treatments | ORR | PFS (mo) | OS (mo) |
Van Cutsem et al[12] (2001) | Phase III | Capecitabine vs 5-FU/LV | 18.9% vs 15.0% (P = 0.013) | 5.2 vs 4.7 (HR = 0.96, P = 0.65) | 13.2 vs 12.1 (HR = 0.92, P = 0.33) |
Hoff et al[11] (2001) | Phase III | Capecitabine vs 5-FU/LV | 24.8% vs 15.5% (P = 0.005) | 4.3 vs 4.7 (HR = 1.03, P = 0.72) | 12.5 vs 13.3 (HR = 1, P = 0.97) |
Van Cutsem et al[13] (2004) | Integrated Analysis (Phase III) | Capecitabine vs 5-FU/LV | 26% vs 17% (P < 0.0002) | 4.6 vs 4.7 (HR = 0.99, P = 0.95) | 12.9 vs 12.8 (HR = 0.95, P = 0.48) |
- Citation: Aguado C, García-Paredes B, Sotelo MJ, Sastre J, Díaz-Rubio E. Should capecitabine replace 5-fluorouracil in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer? World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(20): 6092-6101
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i20/6092.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i20.6092