Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 14, 2014; 20(2): 475-485
Published online Jan 14, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i2.475
Published online Jan 14, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i2.475
Criteria (yr) | Classifications | Definitions of NASH | Characteristics |
Matteoni (1999) | Type 1: steatosis aloneType 2: steatosis with inflammationType 3: steatosis with hepatocyte balloningType 4: Type 3 plus MDB or fibrosis | Type 3 or 4 | Depend on the subjective judgments of observers(existence of hepatocyte balloning)Well correlation with liver-related mortalityInflammation is not included |
NAS (2005) | Steatosis (0-3) Inflammation (0-3) Hepatocyte balloning (0-2) Total: 0 to 8 | Total scores: 5 to 8 | Numerical scoreLow sensitivity, NAS ≥ 4 may be better Fibrosis is not includedNo significant correlation with liver-related mortality Recommended use for assessing the therapeutic effect during clinical studies |
Younossi (2011) | SteatosisHepatocyte balloningMDBFibrosis | Steatosis + Hepatocyte balloningor + MDBor + Fibrosis | Inflammation is not includedWell correlation with Matteoni’s classificationCan diagnose so-called burned-out NASHEssential validation study |
- Citation: Sumida Y, Nakajima A, Itoh Y. Limitations of liver biopsy and non-invasive diagnostic tests for the diagnosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease/nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(2): 475-485
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i2/475.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i2.475