Endoscopic submucosal dissection vs endoscopic mucosal resection for superficial esophageal cancer

doi:10.3748/wjg.v20.i18.5540

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 20, Issue 18

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (9398)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-5) series, Tables (1-1) series.

Item

Count

PDF

747

WORD

272

HTML

6465

Figures (1-5)

168

Tables (1-1)

157

Sum=7809

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

787

Download

802

Sum=1589

May 14, 2014 (publication date) through Jul 27, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (136)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Meta-Analysis

World J Gastroenterol. May 14, 2014; 20(18): 5540-5547
Published online May 14, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i18.5540

Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 2 Comparison of en bloc resection (A) and curative rates (B) between endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection. ESD: Endoscopic submucosal dissection; EMR: Endoscopic mucosal resection.

Citation: Guo HM, Zhang XQ, Chen M, Huang SL, Zou XP. Endoscopic submucosal dissection vs endoscopic mucosal resection for superficial esophageal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(18): 5540-5547
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i18/5540.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i18.5540