Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. May 7, 2014; 20(17): 5045-5050
Published online May 7, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i17.5045
Published online May 7, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i17.5045
Table 1 Profiles of all patients
Patients who underwent 1st EGD | Patients who underwent 2nd or subsequent EGD | P value | |
Gender | NS | ||
Male | 98 | 1060 | |
Female | 82 | 731 | |
Operator | NS | ||
a | 128 | 1144 | |
b | 49 | 599 | |
c | 0 | 28 | |
d | 2 | 16 | |
e | 1 | 4 | |
Age group (yr) | 49.3 ± 13.2 54 | 58.3 ± 11.5 | < 0.05 |
< 39 | 39 | 115 | |
40-49 | 45 | 320 | |
50-59 | 29 | 464 | |
60-69 | 13 | 588 | |
> 70 | 304 | ||
Insertion route | < 0.05 | ||
Transnasal | 139 | 1255 | |
Transoral | 41 | 536 | |
VAS score | 4.50 ± 2.33 | 4.11 ± 2.35 | < 0.05 |
Examination time (s) | NS | ||
306.0 ± 60.0 | 302.1 ± 61.8 | ||
Type of scope | NS | ||
a | 78 | 690 | |
b | 66 | 739 | |
c | 19 | 162 | |
d | 8 | 69 | |
e | 4 | 36 | |
f | 3 | 67 | |
g | 2 | 28 |
- Citation: Ono S, Niimi K, Fujishiro M, Takahashi Y, Sakaguchi Y, Nakayama C, Minatsuki C, Matsuda R, Hirayama-Asada I, Tsuji Y, Mochizuki S, Kodashima S, Yamamichi N, Ozeki A, Matsumoto L, Ohike Y, Yamazaki T, Koike K. Evaluation of preferable insertion routes for esophagogastroduodenoscopy using ultrathin endoscopes. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(17): 5045-5050
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i17/5045.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i17.5045