Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 21, 2014; 20(15): 4208-4219
Published online Apr 21, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i15.4208
Published online Apr 21, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i15.4208
Clinical trial | Type of study | KRAS analysis | Treatment | Response rate | R0 resection rate | PFS (mo) | OS (mo) |
Folprecht et al[37] | Phase I/II | No | Cetuximab-Irinotecan/5FU/FA1 | 67% | 19% | 9.9 | 33 |
Raoul et al[38] | Phase I/II | No | Cetuximab-FOLFIRI | 48% | 19.20% | 8.6 | 22.4 |
CRYSTAL, Van Cutsem et al[6,20] | Phase III | Yes | Cetuximab-FOLFIRI vs FOLFIRI | 57.3% vs 39.7% (OR = 2.069, P < 0.001)2 | 5.1% vs 2% (OR = 2.65, P = 0.0265)2 | 9.9 vs 8.4 (HR = 0.696, P = 0.0012)2 | 23.5 vs 20 (HR = 0.796, P = 0.0093)2 |
FIRE-3, Heinemann et al[41] | Phase III | Yes | Cetuximab-FOLFIRI vs Bevacizumab-FOLFIRI | 62 vs 57 (OR = 1.18, P = 0.183) | 10 vs 10.3 (HR = 1.06, P = 0.547) | 28.7 vs 25 (HR = 0.77, P = 0.017) |
- Citation: Sotelo MJ, García-Paredes B, Aguado C, Sastre J, Díaz-Rubio E. Role of cetuximab in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(15): 4208-4219
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i15/4208.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i15.4208