Topic Highlight
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 21, 2014; 20(15): 4151-4159
Published online Apr 21, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i15.4151
Table 4 Clinical trials for evaluating the effect of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization with sorafenib in intermediate stage of hepatocellular carcinoma
Ref.Acronym (NCT number)Reported yearTrial phaseStudy designnTACEOutcomes
Pawlik et al[56]-2011IISingle-arm (TACE plus sorafenib)33DEB/scheduledDisease control rate = 100%, per lesion. Objective response = 58%, per lesion
Park et al[57]-2012IISingle-arm (TACE plus sorafenib)50Conventional1/on demandMedian TTP = 7.1 mo
6-mo PFS rate = 52%
Kudo et al[59]Post TACE study2011IIITACE plus sorafenib vs TACE plus placebo458Conventional1/1 or 2 sessionsMedian TTP = 5.4 (sorafenib)/3.7 (placebo) mo. HR [sorafenib] = 0.87; 95%CI: 0.70-1.09; P = 0.252
Lencioni et al[58]SPACE2012IITACE plus sorafenib vs TACE plus placebo307DEB/scheduledMedian TTP = 169 (sorafenib)/166 (placebo) d. HR [sorafenib] = 0.79; 95%CI: 0.588-1.080; P = 0.072
Kudo et al2TACTICS (NCT01217034)Currently recruiting participantsIITACE plus sorafenib vs TACE alone2283Conventional1/on demandTime to untreatable progression4
Meyer et al2CRUK-TACE-2 (NCT01324076)Currently recruiting participantsIIITACE plus sorafenib vs TACE plus placebo4123DEB/1 sessionPFS4
Kauh et al2(NCT01004978)Currently recruiting participantsIIITACE plus sorafenib vs TACE plus placebo4003Conventional1 or DEB/scheduledPFS4