Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 14, 2014; 20(14): 3905-3915
Published online Apr 14, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i14.3905
Published online Apr 14, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i14.3905
Ref. | Regimen | No. of patients | Response rate | Median PFS/TTP and OS (mo) |
Kang et al[82] | Docetaxel or irinotecan + BSC vs BSC | 202 | - | TTP, NA; OS, 5.3 vs 3.8 |
Thuss-Patience et al[83] | Irinotecan vs BSC | 40 | 44% vs 5% | PFS, 2.6 vs NA; OS, 4.0 vs 2.4 |
Ford et al[84] | Docetaxel + BSC vs BSC | 168 | 7% vs NA | PFS, 5.6 vs 5.0; OS, 5.2 vs 3.6 |
Shimada et al[85] | Irinotecan + cisplatin vs irinotecan | 130 | 21.9% vs 16.4% | PFS, 4.17 vs 3.03; OS, NA |
- Citation: Bilici A. Treatment options in patients with metastatic gastric cancer: Current status and future perspectives. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(14): 3905-3915
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i14/3905.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i14.3905