Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 7, 2014; 20(13): 3680-3692
Published online Apr 7, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i13.3680
Published online Apr 7, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i13.3680
Figure 3 Non-randomized studies.
A: Case-control studies comparing laparoscopy and open surgery. X in the table refers to a statistical association provided in the studies; B: Meta-analysis of the out-come measures; C: Forest plot graph regarding studies investigating hospital stay. 1Statistic analysis not performed; 2Significant difference of follow-up according to the stage of the disease. Lap: Laparoscopy; OS: Open surgery; FU: Mean follow-up; OT: Operative time; BF: Bowel function; OI: Oral intake; PP: Post-operative Pain; BL: Blood loss; HOSP: Hospital stay; LNH: Lymph node harvest; NS: Not significant.
-
Citation: Lorenzon L, La Torre M, Ziparo V, Montebelli F, Mercantini P, Balducci G, Ferri M. Evidence based medicine and surgical approaches for colon cancer: Evidences, benefits and limitations of the laparoscopic
vs open resection. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(13): 3680-3692 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i13/3680.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i13.3680