Risk factors of lymphatic metastasis complement poor radiological detection in gallbladder cancer

doi:10.3748/wjg.v20.i1.290

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 20, Issue 1

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (5570)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-1) series, Tables (1-5) series.

Item

Count

PDF

284

WORD

194

HTML

2375

Figures (1-1)

163

Tables (1-5)

144

Sum=3160

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

1026

Download

1384

Sum=2410

Jan 7, 2014 (publication date) through Jul 22, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (3)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Brief Article

World J Gastroenterol. Jan 7, 2014; 20(1): 290-295
Published online Jan 7, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i1.290

Table 5 Correlations between differentiation type and age, lymphatic metastasis (n = 63)

Differentiation type¹	Age < 60 yr (n = 28)	Age≥60 yr (n = 35)	P value (G1 vs G2-4)	No LM	LM	P value (G1 vs G2-4)
G1	9	13	0.679	13	9	0.250
G2-4	19	22		18	23
G2	10	12		10	12
G3	7	10		7	10
G4	2	0		1	1

¹G1 indicates well differentiated, G2 indicates moderately differentiated, and G3 indicates poorly differentiated G4 as undifferentiated. LM: Lymphatic metastasis.

Citation: Yu TN, Shen B, Meng N, Yu H, Cai XJ. Risk factors of lymphatic metastasis complement poor radiological detection in gallbladder cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(1): 290-295
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i1/290.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i1.290