Field Of Vision
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 14, 2013; 19(6): 797-801
Published online Feb 14, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i6.797
Table 2 Comparison between contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced computed tomography in the follow-up scheme after liver cancer ablation
CEUSCECT
Pharmacokinetics of the contrastEarly vascular phase; followed by diffusion into the interstitial spacePure blood pool tracer; without diffusion into the interstitial space
Strong pointsReal-time scanning, easy to perform, no radiation, wide availability, and no allergic reactionsHigh image quality; operator-independent; panoramic imaging; easy to interpret
Weak pointsImage quality is apt to be affected by lesions located near the liver dome, and obscuration by gas from the lung or intestine;Inferior temporal resolution; allergic reaction to the contrast-medium; unsuitable for patients with kidney function impairment; radiation; inferior availability
Inability to imaging multiple lesions in one procedure; operator-dependent