Hepatocellular carcinoma after ablation: The imaging follow-up scheme

doi:10.3748/wjg.v19.i6.797

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 19, Issue 6

This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (5412)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, HTML series, Figures (1-1) series, Tables (1-2) series.

Item

Count

PDF

344

HTML

2862

Figures (1-1)

148

Tables (1-2)

143

Sum=3497

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

1056

Download

859

Sum=1915

Feb 14, 2013 (publication date) through Jul 5, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (12)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Field Of Vision

World J Gastroenterol. Feb 14, 2013; 19(6): 797-801
Published online Feb 14, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i6.797

Table 1 Diagnostic values of contrast-enhanced imaging in evaluating treatment response after ablation for liver cancer

Ref.	n	Imaging	Accuracy	Sen	Spe	PPV	NPV
¹Lu et al[18]	151 patients	CEUS	96.6%	-	98.20%	-	-
Frieser et al[39]	76 patients 118 nodules	CEUS	93.8%	-	-	-	-
		CECT	86.2%	-	-	-	-
		CEUS	100%	-	-	-	-
		CEMRI	88.4%	-	-	-	-
²Ricci et al[40]	100 patients	CEUS	-	92.3%	100%	100%	97.4%
²Ricci et al[40]	100 nodules	CEUS	-	92.3%	100%	100%	97.4%
²Salvaggio et al[41]	148 nodules	CEUS	97%	83.3%	100%	-	-

¹In comparison with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) or contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CEMRI);

²In comparison with CECT. -: Not applicable. Sen: Sensitivity; Spe: Specificity; PPV: Positive predictive value; NPV: Negative predictive value; CEUS: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound.

Citation: Liu LN, Xu HX, Zhang YF, Xu JM. Hepatocellular carcinoma after ablation: The imaging follow-up scheme. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(6): 797-801
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v19/i6/797.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i6.797