Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 7, 2013; 19(5): 706-714
Published online Feb 7, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i5.706
Published online Feb 7, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i5.706
EVO(n = 45) | PTVE(n = 32) | P value | |
Status of GV | 0.290 | ||
Disappeared | 17/45 | 16/32 | |
Collapsed | 16/45 | 12/32 | |
Remained | 12/45 | 4/32 | |
Amount of cyanoacrylate (mL) | 3.03 ± 1.04 | 6.69 ± 2.92 | 0.000 |
Rebleeding | 17/45 | 4/32 | 0.028 |
Rebleeding from GV | 13/45 | 2/32 | 0.029 |
Rebleeding from other sources | 4/45 | 2/32 | 1.000 |
EV bleeding | 2 | 1 | 1.000 |
PHG | 1 | 1 | 1.000 |
Unknown | 1 | 0 | 1.000 |
Death during follow-up | 8/45 | 4/32 | 0.751 |
Causes of death | |||
Progressive Liver failure | 5/45 | 3/32 | 1.000 |
Rebleeding | 2/45 | 1/32 | 1.000 |
HCC | 1/45 | 0/32 | 1.000 |
- Citation: Wang J, Tian XG, Li Y, Zhang CQ, Liu FL, Cui Y, Liu JY. Comparison of modified percutaneous transhepatic variceal embolization and endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection for gastric variceal rebleeding. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(5): 706-714
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v19/i5/706.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i5.706