Comparison of different methods of intestinal obstruction in a rat model

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 19, Issue 5

This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

All Articles published online

Item

Count

PDF

470

HTML

3852

Figures (1-7)

322

Tables (1-3)

192

Sum=4836

Publishing Process of This Article

Item

Count

Browse

1303

Download

1005

Sum=2308

Feb 7, 2013 (publication date) through Nov 27, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Original Article

World J Gastroenterol. Feb 7, 2013; 19(5): 692-705
Published online Feb 7, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i5.692

Table 2 Criteria for scoring micromorphous intestinal damage

Feature	Description	Score
Ulceration	None	0
	Ulceration < 3 mm, no hyperemia or focal hyperemia, no ulceration	1
	Ulceration < 3 mm, with focal hyperemia or ulceration > 3 mm, without hyperemia	2
	Ulceration > 3 mm or hyperemia	3
Inﬂammation	None	0
	Slight	1
	Moderate	2
	Severe	3
Fibrogenesis	None	0
	Slight	1
	Severe	2
Extent of	None	0
involved	Submucosa	1
bowel wall	Muscular layer and even serosa	2
Total score		10

Citation: Yuan ML, Yang Z, Li YC, Shi LL, Guo JL, Huang YQ, Kang X, Cheng JJ, Chen Y, Yu T, Cao DQ, Pang H, Zhang X. Comparison of different methods of intestinal obstruction in a rat model. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(5): 692-705
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v19/i5/692.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i5.692