Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 28, 2013; 19(48): 9453-9460
Published online Dec 28, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i48.9453
Published online Dec 28, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i48.9453
Ref. | Sequence generation | Allocation concealment | Blinding of participants | Incomplete outcome | Selective outcome | Other sources of bias |
Heo et al[22] 2007 | Computer random number generator | Sealed envelope | Outcome assessment blinded | No missingoutcome data | All prespecifiedoutcomes reported | No |
Hong et al[11] 2009 | Unclear | Not reported | Unclear | No missingoutcome data | All prespecifiedoutcomes reported | No |
Kim et al[23] 2009 | The order of the procedure | Not reported | Unclear | No missingoutcome data | All prespecifiedoutcomes reported | No |
Kim et al[12] 2009 | Unclear | Not reported | Unclear | No missingoutcome data | All prespecifiedoutcomes reported | No |
Stefanidis et al[24] 2011 | Random number table | Sealed envelope | Outcome assessment blinded | No missingoutcome data | All prespecifiedoutcomes reported | No |
Teoh et al[13] 2013 | Computer random number generator | Sealed envelope | Outcome assessment blinded | No missingoutcome data | All prespecifiedoutcomes reported | No |
-
Citation: Yang XM, Hu B. Endoscopic sphincterotomy plus large-balloon dilation
vs endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis: A meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(48): 9453-9460 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v19/i48/9453.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i48.9453