Current management of fecal incontinence: Choosing amongst treatment options to optimize outcomes

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 19, Issue 48

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

All Articles published online

Item

Count

PDF

582

HTML

5950

Tables (1-8)

224

Sum=6756

Publishing Process of This Article

Item

Count

Browse

1078

Download

852

Sum=1930

Dec 28, 2013 (publication date) through Jul 24, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Topic Highlight

World J Gastroenterol. Dec 28, 2013; 19(48): 9216-9230
Published online Dec 28, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i48.9216

Table 6 Outcomes of antegrade continence enema in incontinent adults

Ref.	Year	Patients using antegrade continence enema on follow-up	Percentage of patients achieving continence	Complication rate
Gerharz et al[121]	1997	8	100%	44%
Teichman et al[120]	1998	7	86%	71%
Teichman et al[128]	2003	4	75%	67%
Lefevre et al[127]	2006	18	94%	33%
Poirier et al[126]	2007	14	78%	67%

Citation: Koughnett JAMV, Wexner SD. Current management of fecal incontinence: Choosing amongst treatment options to optimize outcomes. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(48): 9216-9230
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v19/i48/9216.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i48.9216