Current management of fecal incontinence: Choosing amongst treatment options to optimize outcomes

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 19, Issue 48

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

All Articles published online

Item

Count

PDF

620

HTML

6591

Tables (1-8)

383

Sum=7594

Publishing Process of This Article

Item

Count

Browse

1165

Download

950

Sum=2115

Dec 28, 2013 (publication date) through Feb 21, 2025

Times Cited of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Topic Highlight

World J Gastroenterol. Dec 28, 2013; 19(48): 9216-9230
Published online Dec 28, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i48.9216

Table 5 Outcomes of graciloplasty

Ref.	Year	Type of graciloplasty	Patients (n)	Success (percentage of patients)
Kumar et al[114]	1995	Unstimulated	9	100%
Eccersley et al[113]	1999	Unstimulated	8	100%
Madoff et al[109]	1999	Stimulated	128	66%
Wexner et al[110]	2002	Stimulated	115	62%
Bresler et al[112]	2002	Stimulated	24	79%
Rongen et al[111]	2003	Stimulated	200	72%
Thornton et al[117]	2004	Stimulated	38	73%
Hassan et al[107]	2010	Stimulated	31	71%

Citation: Koughnett JAMV, Wexner SD. Current management of fecal incontinence: Choosing amongst treatment options to optimize outcomes. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(48): 9216-9230
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v19/i48/9216.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i48.9216