Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 7, 2013; 19(45): 8420-8426
Published online Dec 7, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i45.8420
Table 1 Characteristics of clinical studies of bile leakage test
StudyDesignComparisonMaterialSample (trial:control)Inclusion criteriaLiver diseaseCountry
Ijichi et al[11], (2000)RCTBL Test vs N-BL TestSaline solution51:51Liver resectionTumorJapan
Liu et al[13], (2012)RCTBL Test vs N-BL TestFat emulsion53:54Liver resectionTumor or hepatolithiasisChina
Li et al[12], (2009)Controlled clinical trialBL Test vs N-BL TestFat emulsion57:70Major liver resectionTumorGermany
Suehiro et al[24], (2005)Controlled clinical trialBL Test vs N-BL TestICG40:40Liver resectionLiver donorJapan
Lam et al[2], (2001)Controlled clinical trialBL Test vs N-BL TestMethylene304:312Liver resectionTumorHong Kong
blue
Leelawat et al[26], (2012)Controlled clinical trialWhite Test vs Saline Solution TestFat emulsion30:30Liver resectionTumorThailand
Sakaguchi et al[27], (2010)Controlled clinical trialICGF Test vs N-ICGF TestICG27:32Liver resectionTumorJapan
Kaibori et al[25], (2011)RCTICGF Test vs N-ICGF TestICG52:50Liver resectionTumorJapan