Brief Article
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 7, 2013; 19(45): 8357-8365
Published online Dec 7, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i45.8357
Table 5 Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma based on magnetic resonance imaging findings after excluding cysts and hemangiomas (n = 89)
MRI findingsSensitivity (%)Specificity (%)Positive predictive value (%)Negative predictive value (%)
Fat metamorphosis16.9 (8.4-29.0)93.3 (77.9-99.2)83.3 (51.6-97.9)36.4 (25.7-48.1)
Hyperintensity on T2-weighted images66.1 (52.6-77.9)93.3 (77.9-99.2)95.1 (83.5-99.4)58.3 (43.2-72.4)
Arterial enhancement88.1 (77.1-95.1)70.0 (50.6-85.3)85.2 (73.8-93.0)75.0 (55.1-89.3)
Arterial enhancement and washout on venous or equilibrium phase79.7 (67.2-89.0)96.7 (82.8-99.9)97.9 (88.9-99.9)70.7 (54.5-83.9)
Hypointensity on 20-min hepatobiliary phase93.2 (83.5-98.1)53.3 (34.3-71.7)79.7 (68.3-88.4)80.0 (56.3-94.3)
Arterial enhancement and no/partial uptake on 20-min hepatobiliary phase83.1 (71.0-91.6)93.3 (77.9-99.2)96.1 (86.5-99.5)73.7 (56.9-86.6)