Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 28, 2013; 19(44): 7955-7971
Published online Nov 28, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i44.7955
Published online Nov 28, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i44.7955
Clinical trial | Phase | Line | Regimen | Median PFS (mo) | Median OS (mo) | ORR (%) |
Aflibercept | ||||||
VELOUR NCT00561470[87] | III | 2nd | FOLFIRI + aflibercept vs FOLFIRI + placebo | 6.90 vs 4.67 HR = 0.758, P = 0.0001 | 13.50 vs 12.06 HR = 0.817, P = 0.0032 | 19.8 vs 11.1 P = 0.001 |
AFFIRM NCT00851084[86] | II | 1st | mFOLFOX6 + aflibercept vs mFOLFOX6 | 8.48 vs 8.77 | 49.1 vs 45.9 | |
Brivanib | ||||||
NCT00640471[90] | III | 3rd | Cetuximab + brivanib vs cetuximab + placebo | 5.0 vs 3.4 HR = 0.72, P < 0.001 | 8.8 vs 8.1 HR = 0.88, P = 0.12 | 13.6 vs 7.2 P = 0.004 |
Regorafenib | ||||||
CORRECT NCT01103323[99] | III | 2nd | Regorafenib vs placebo | 1.9 vs 1.7 HR = 0.49, P < 0.000001 | 6.4 vs 5.0 HR = 0.77, P = 0.0052 | |
Sorafenib | ||||||
RESPECT NCT00865709[107] | II | 1st | mFOLFOX6 + sorafenib vs mFOLFOX6 + placebo | 9.1 vs 8.7 HR = 0.88, P = 0.46 | 17.6 vs 18.1 HR = 1.13, P = 0.51 | |
Sunitinib | ||||||
NCT00668863 | II | 1st | ||||
NCT00457691[108] | III | 1st | FOLFIRI + sunitinib vs FOLFIRI + placebo | 7.8 vs 8.4 HR = 1.095, P = 0.807 | 20.3 vs 19.8 HR = 1.171, P = 0.916 | 32 vs 34 P = 0.683 |
Valatanib | ||||||
CONFIRM1 NCT00056459[110] | III | 1st | FOLFOX4 + vatalanib vs FOLFOX4 + placebo | 7.7 vs 7.6 HR = 0.88, P = 0.118 | 21.4 vs 20.5 HR = 1.08, P = 0.260 | P > 0.05 |
CONFIRM 2 NCT00056446[111] | III | 2nd | FOLFOX4 + vatalanib vs FOLFOX4 + placebo | 5.6 vs 4.2HR = 0.83, P = 0.013 | 13.1 vs 11.9HR = 1.00, P = 0.957 |
- Citation: Marques I, Araújo A, Mello RA. Anti-angiogenic therapies for metastatic colorectal cancer: Current and future perspectives. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(44): 7955-7971
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v19/i44/7955.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i44.7955