Topic Highlight
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 21, 2013; 19(43): 7552-7560
Published online Nov 21, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i43.7552
Table 1 Association between the definitions of remission and mucosal healing and actual healing rates in patients with ulcerative colitis treated with mesalazine
AuthorDesignStudyTiming of endoscopyEndoscopic indexDef. of MHNo of pat. Achieving MH
Vecchi (2001)Mc, RCTMesalazine 4 g orally vs 2 + 2 g orally and enema6 wkRachmilewitzRachmilewitz < 458% vs 71%
Malchow (2002)Mc, db, RCTMesalazine 4 g enema vs 1 g foam4 wkRachmilewitzRachmilewitz < 238% vs 37%
Mansfield (2002)Mc, db, RCTBalsalazide 6.75 g vs sulfasal. 3g8 wk4 point scaleScore of 0 = normal mucosa27% vs 25%
Hanauer (2007) AscendMc, db, RCTAsacol 4.8 g vs 2.4 g6 wkDescriptive, no scoreNormal endoscopic finding25% vs 20%
Kamm (2007) MMXMc, db, RCTMMX mes. 4.8 g vs 2.4 g vs placebo8 wkMod. Sutherland indexMod Sutherland index < 177% vs 69% vs 46%
Kruis (2009)Mc, db, RCTMesalazine 3 g vs 1g x 38 wkRachmilewitzRachmilewitz < 471% vs 70%