Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 21, 2013; 19(43): 7515-7530
Published online Nov 21, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i43.7515
Published online Nov 21, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i43.7515
Advantages | Disadvantages | |
Resection | Higher complete effectiveness than non-surgical procedures | Unfeasible in patients with decompensated liver disease or severe portal hypertension |
More simple in cases with peripheral subglissonian nodules | ||
TACE | More effective using the selective/superselective technique in well-vascularized nodules with large feeding arteries | Unfeasible in patients with severely reduced portal vein flow, intratumoral arteriovenous fistula, or renal failure (creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min) |
TARE | Possible better effectiveness than TACE in cases with multiple nodules | Less experience with TARE than TACEHigh cost |
RFA | More effective in nodules ≤ 3 cm | Potentially dangerous in patients with impaired clotting parameters or lesions located superficially or near the gallbladder, major bile ducts, or bowel loops |
PEI | More effective in nodules ≤ 3 cmSuitable in patients with impaired clotting parameters or lesions located in dangerous sites for thermal ablation | Less effective than RFA for nodules > 2 cm |
PLA | More effective in nodules ≤ 3 cmSuitable in patients with impaired clotting parameters | Less experience with PLA than RFATechnically complexPotentially dangerous in cases of lesions located superficially or near the gallbladder, major bile ducts, or bowel loops |
MWA | Possible better effectiveness than RFA in nodules ≥ 3 cm or located near large vessels | Less experience with MWA than RFAPotentially dangerous in patients with impaired clotting parameters or withlesions located superficially or near the gallbladder, major bile ducts, or bowel loops |
- Citation: Pompili M, Francica G, Ponziani FR, Iezzi R, Avolio AW. Bridging and downstaging treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients on the waiting list for liver transplantation. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(43): 7515-7530
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v19/i43/7515.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i43.7515