Effect of low-dose amitriptyline on globus pharyngeus and its side effects

Table 3 Changes in social functioning-36 subscale scores in patients treated with amitriptyline vs Pantoprazole

Variable		Baseline	Week 4	P value
PF	AMT	95 ± 11.4	95.94 ± 11.14	0.945
	Conventional	93.93 ± 7.12	95.71 ± 4.75
RP	AMT	64.06 ± 37.6	81.25 ± 26.611	0.929
	Conventional	66.07 ± 37.48	80.36 ± 28.041
BP	AMT	89.38 ± 16.52	90.63 ± 14.55	0.498
	Conventional	85.57 ± 20.68	86.29 ± 19.96
GH	AMT	56.75 ± 20.92	73 ± 17.571	0.044
	Conventional	49.86 ± 22.49	58.71 ± 19.571
VT	AMT	70.63 ± 18.15	88.44 ± 7.011	0.024
	Conventional	71.79 ± 24.7	73.21 ± 24.39
SF	AMT	75 ± 18.25	92.97 ± 13.671	0.049
	Conventional	77.68 ± 18.46	81.25 ± 17.511
RE	AMT	68.76 ± 35.42	79.18 ± 23.961	0.384
	Conventional	61.91 ± 41.05	69.05 ± 38.04
MH	AMT	68.75 ± 15.68	83.5 ± 101	0.005
	Conventional	65.43 ± 19.32	69.14 ± 15.72

¹Statistically significant difference compared with baseline, P < 0.05 between the two groups. AMT: Amitriptyline; PF: Physical functioning; RP: Role-physical; BP: Bodily pain; GH: General health; VT: Vitality; SF: Social functioning; RE: Role-emotional; MH: Mental health.