Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 14, 2013; 19(42): 7389-7398
Published online Nov 14, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i42.7389
Published online Nov 14, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i42.7389
Significant variable | LTP | IDR | OS | ||||||
HR | 95%CI | P value1 | HR | 95%CI | P value1 | HR ratio | 95%CI | P value1 | |
Tumor size (4.1-5.0 cm), yes/no | 1.032 | 0.521-1.376 | 0.475 | 0.891 | 0.452-1.602 | 0.744 | 0.882 | 0.673-1.572 | 0.084 |
AM (> 1.0 cm), yes/no | 1.484 | 0.101-1.812 | 0.001 | 1.278 | 1.137-1.729 | 0.025 | 1.604 | 0.881-2.753 | 0.002 |
AFP (> 200 ng/mL), yes/no | 0.947 | 0.540-1.050 | 0.531 | 0.509 | 0.370-1.215 | 0.546 | 1.007 | 0.639-1.158 | 0.748 |
No. of ablation sessions before getting AM ≥ 0.5 cm (2 sessions), yes/no | 1.012 | 0.683-1.772 | 0.663 | 0.923 | 0.562-1.218 | 0.347 | 0.745 | 0.321-.431 | 0.325 |
- Citation: Ke S, Ding XM, Qian XJ, Zhou YM, Cao BX, Gao K, Sun WB. Radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma sized > 3 and ≤ 5 cm: Is ablative margin of more than 1 cm justified? World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(42): 7389-7398
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v19/i42/7389.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i42.7389