Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 14, 2013; 19(42): 7389-7398
Published online Nov 14, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i42.7389
Published online Nov 14, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i42.7389
Table 2 Comparison of the recurrence pattern between the 0.5-1.0 cm group and > 1.0 cm group n (%)
Recurrence pattern | 0.5-1.0 cm group (n = 158) | > 1.0 cm group (n = 123) | P value1 |
LTP only | 74 (46.8) | 39 (31.7) | 0.01 |
IDR only | 34 (21.5) | 22 (17.9) | 0.45 |
LTP + IDR | 38 (24.1) | 16 (13.0) | 0.02 |
Total LTP | 112 (70.9) | 55 (44.7) | < 0.001 |
Total IDR | 72 (45.6) | 38 (30.9) | 0.012 |
- Citation: Ke S, Ding XM, Qian XJ, Zhou YM, Cao BX, Gao K, Sun WB. Radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma sized > 3 and ≤ 5 cm: Is ablative margin of more than 1 cm justified? World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(42): 7389-7398
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v19/i42/7389.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i42.7389