Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 28, 2013; 19(4): 463-481
Published online Jan 28, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i4.463
Published online Jan 28, 2013. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i4.463
Ref. | Drug regimen | Percentage of side effects | Severe hypotension (< 60 mmHg) | Severe desaturation (< 90%) |
Ljubicić et al[98] | Propofol | 17.3% (including bradycardia: 11.8%) | 5.5% | |
Conigliaro et al[95] | Midazolam | 0.47% | ||
Gasparović et al[28] | Propofol | 2.9% | 0.5% | 2.4% |
Sharma et al[97] | Cardiopulmonary events | EGD: 0.6%; Colonoscopy: 1.1%;ERCP: 2.1%; EUS: 0.9% | ||
Nayar et al[96] | Propofol deep sedation vs moderate sedation | 0.6% vs 1.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% (apnoea: 0.3%) |
Correia et al[69] | Midazolam plus propofol vs midazolam plus fentanyl | 14% vs 7.3% | ||
Amornyotin et al[87] | Diluted vs undiluted propofol for deep sedation | 18.2% vs 42.9% | 11.4% vs 31.0% | 0 vs 2.4% |
Wang et al[32] | Midazolam vs midazolam combined with either fentanyl or propofol | Midazolam combined with propofol resulted in hypotension and bradycardia more significantly than a combination with fentanyl or midazolam alone |
- Citation: Triantafillidis JK, Merikas E, Nikolakis D, Papalois AE. Sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy: Current issues. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(4): 463-481
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v19/i4/463.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i4.463